
Bombay HC Criticizes Government’s Role in Legal Proceedings
Bombay HC Criticizes Government’s Role in Legal Proceedings
In a noteworthy commentary on the Central government’s engagement in legal matters, the Bombay High Court expressed concerns about its role as the largest litigant and its frequent requests for adjournments, despite emphasizing the importance of the “ease of doing business.”
Government’s Frequent Requests for Adjournments
The division bench of Justices Gautam Patel and Kamal Khata voiced its observations while addressing a petition filed by Ramkali Gupta in 2016, relating to property issues. The bench was taken aback by the fact that Gupta’s petition had languished for seven years. Moreover, since June of the current year, the plea had been adjourned multiple times at the behest of the Union government, awaiting the appearance of the additional solicitor general.
The court noted the Union government’s repetitive claims about case backlogs, frequent adjournments, and their impact on the ease of doing business. However, it pointed out that these assertions often ignored the fact that the government itself was the primary litigant, and it was frequently responsible for unnecessary adjournments, as demonstrated by the current case.
Strong Displeasure Towards Repeated Adjournments
Expressing strong disapproval of repeated adjournment requests, the court stressed that the issue raised in the petition was narrow and suitable for a final hearing at the admission stage itself.
The court also remarked that it did not expect the additional solicitor general to be personally present in every Union of India-related matter. Instead, it emphasized the need for competent advocates from his office to share the workload and assist in fulfilling the duties of his office.
In the end, the bench adjourned the plea for the last time, citing courtesy to the additional solicitor general.
This commentary by the Bombay High Court sheds light on the challenges faced by the judiciary in managing the legal proceedings involving the government and underscores the need for efficient handling of cases, especially those with narrow issues, to ensure timely justice and the ease of doing business.
Latest Posts
- Shein flags tariff hits after posting quarterly loss ahead of Hong Kong IPO
July 26, 2026 | Breaking News, Business - Suspect in Berlin Pride attack shot dead during operation, police say
July 26, 2026 | Breaking News, World - US-Iran Tensions: Iran Warns Against Fresh US Attacks
July 26, 2026 | Breaking News, World - 10 Killed in China Flash Flood
July 26, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Students Protests: Central Govt To Introduce Anti-Paper Leak Law On Monday, All Eyes On It
July 26, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - Following the Supreme Court’s Order, Uttar Pradesh Govt Reconstitutes SIT to Probe Ayodhya Ram Temple Donation Scam
July 26, 2026 | Breaking News, India - Cockroach Janta Party: From Satire to One of India’s Largest Youth Movements, What’s Next?
July 26, 2026 | Articles/Editorials, Featured by VoM - International Criminal Court members dismiss prosecutor Karim Khan, diplomatic sources say
July 24, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Qualcomm tells customers of double-digit price increases, Bloomberg News reports
July 24, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, Stock Market - Singapore Sovereign Wealth Fund GIC Boosts Hedge Fund Investments by $30 Billion
July 24, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, Stock Market