
Property Seized by ED Must be Returned within 365 Days: Delhi HC
Property Seized by ED Must be Returned within 365 Days: Delhi HC
In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has stated that properties seized by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act (PMLA) should be returned if the investigation does not result in any proceedings within 365 days. Justice Navin Chawla emphasized that the continuation of seizure beyond this period, without pending proceedings related to any offense before a court, violates Article 300A of the Constitution and is confiscatory in nature. The court’s decision came in response to a petition filed by the resolution professional of Bhushan Power and Steel Limited (BPSL), challenging the continued seizure of documents, records, digital devices, gold, and diamond jewelry.
Court Directs Return of Seized Property in Absence of Proceedings
In cases where there are no proceedings concerning the seized property, the court directed the authorities to promptly return them to the petitioner. The ruling specified that if the investigation extends beyond 365 days without leading to any proceedings under the Act, the seizure lapses, and the property must be returned. The ED was instructed to return documents, digital devices, and other materials seized during a search-and-seizure operation in August 2020 to the petitioner, unless a competent court issues an order to the contrary.
Confiscation Violates Constitutional Principles
The court clarified that retaining documents and properties is permissible for investigative or adjudicative purposes but can only extend beyond 365 days if proceedings are initiated before a special court. However, in this case, as the investigation did not result in a complaint or supplementary complaint, the court held that the seizure was no longer valid. The ruling emphasized that a continued seizure beyond 365 days, without pending proceedings related to any offense, violates Article 300A, constituting a confiscatory action lacking legal authority.
This ruling sets a precedent for the timely conclusion of investigations, preventing prolonged seizures without legal justification and reinforcing constitutional principles.
Latest Posts
- Thousands of British Kashmiris Protest Against Pakistani Forces Over Alleged Atrocities in PoJK
June 15, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Lt Gen Dhiraj Seth Appointed Next Army Chief of India , To Serve Till August 31, 2028
June 15, 2026 | Breaking News, India - Two Helicopters Collide Mid-Air in Brazil, Six Crew Members Killed
June 15, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Powerful Collision of Car With Truck on Jammu-Srinagar NH, 3 Died, Two Injured
June 14, 2026 | Breaking News, Jammu Kashmir - North Korea Says Nuclear Status Is Irreversible, Kim Yo Jong Calls It A “Line of No Retreat”
June 14, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Violence in Northwestern Nigeria: 17 Farmers Killed, 13 Injured as Insecurity Persists
June 14, 2026 | Breaking News, Crime, World - Japan Delegation Heading To Greenland For Accessing/Evaluating Rare Earth Minerals Extraction
June 14, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Iran-US Deal in Final Stage; Next 24 Hours Crucial, Says Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif
June 14, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Violations of Hormuz Blockade Won’t Be Tolerated: Marco Rubio Tells S. Jaishankar
June 14, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Donald Trump Vows to Sign Deal with Iran Tomorrow, Tehran Downplays Announcement
June 14, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World