
Property Seized by ED Must be Returned within 365 Days: Delhi HC
Property Seized by ED Must be Returned within 365 Days: Delhi HC
In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has stated that properties seized by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act (PMLA) should be returned if the investigation does not result in any proceedings within 365 days. Justice Navin Chawla emphasized that the continuation of seizure beyond this period, without pending proceedings related to any offense before a court, violates Article 300A of the Constitution and is confiscatory in nature. The court’s decision came in response to a petition filed by the resolution professional of Bhushan Power and Steel Limited (BPSL), challenging the continued seizure of documents, records, digital devices, gold, and diamond jewelry.
Court Directs Return of Seized Property in Absence of Proceedings
In cases where there are no proceedings concerning the seized property, the court directed the authorities to promptly return them to the petitioner. The ruling specified that if the investigation extends beyond 365 days without leading to any proceedings under the Act, the seizure lapses, and the property must be returned. The ED was instructed to return documents, digital devices, and other materials seized during a search-and-seizure operation in August 2020 to the petitioner, unless a competent court issues an order to the contrary.
Confiscation Violates Constitutional Principles
The court clarified that retaining documents and properties is permissible for investigative or adjudicative purposes but can only extend beyond 365 days if proceedings are initiated before a special court. However, in this case, as the investigation did not result in a complaint or supplementary complaint, the court held that the seizure was no longer valid. The ruling emphasized that a continued seizure beyond 365 days, without pending proceedings related to any offense, violates Article 300A, constituting a confiscatory action lacking legal authority.
This ruling sets a precedent for the timely conclusion of investigations, preventing prolonged seizures without legal justification and reinforcing constitutional principles.
Latest Posts
- Telangana Heatstroke Toll Reaches 16, Compensation Awarded
May 25, 2026 | Breaking News - Hike in Petrol and Diesel Prices, Petrol Reaches Rs 102.12 Per Litre in Delhi
May 25, 2026 | Breaking News, India, World - Mamata Banerjee Alleges Election Data Hacking After BJP’s West Bengal Victory
May 25, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - United States & India Share Strategic Alliance; Marco Rubio Tells S Jaishankar
May 24, 2026 | Breaking News, India, World - Pakistan Train Blast: 24 Killed, Baloch Liberation Army Claims Responsibility for Attack
May 24, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Liushenyu Coal Mine Blast Kills At Least 90 Workers, President Xi Jinping Urges Workplace Safety
May 24, 2026 | Breaking News, World - India-Canada Eyes $50 Billion Trade Goal, Minister Piyush Goyal Heads to Canada
May 23, 2026 | Breaking News, India, World - Iran-US Talks Heading Positively, Both Countries Ahead for Ending Middle East Conflict
May 23, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Major Gladglare: Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha appointed as chairman of the Rajya Sabha Committee on Petitions
May 23, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - Jammu Kashmir High Court Quashes PSA Detention of Activist Rehmatullah Padder; Orders Immediate Release
May 22, 2026 | Breaking News, Doda, Jammu Kashmir