
JK High Court Acquits Employee, Emphasizes Strong Evidence Requirement.image/KL
JK High Court Acquits Employee, Emphasizes Strong Evidence Requirement
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court, encompassing Ladakh, has nullified the conviction and two-year imprisonment of a government employee, emphasizing the need for robust evidence and recognizing the substantial distinction between ‘could be true’ and ‘must be true.’
Mansoor Ahmad Malik, an employee facing a two-year jail sentence, had his conviction overturned by the High Court. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul, heading the court, granted approval to Malik’s appeal, asserting that the prosecution failed to establish the demand for illegal gratification. Originally sentenced in connection with a 2009 corruption case, Malik was acquitted under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul, leading the bench, declared, “The prosecution has failed to prove clearly and explicitly the demand for illegal gratification.” The court emphasized that “suspicion, no matter how strong, cannot and must not be permitted to take the place of proof.”
Underlining the judicial responsibility in criminal cases, the bench commented, “The significant gap between ‘may be’ true and ‘must be’ true must be bridged through clear, cogent, and unimpeachable evidence presented by the prosecution before an accused is pronounced as a convict.” The court underscored the importance of maintaining a substantial distance between mere conjectures and definite conclusions through impartial judicial scrutiny.
“If the facts and circumstances of a case necessitate it, then the benefit of the doubt must be accorded to the accused.” It clarified that a reasonable doubt is “not an imaginary, trivial, or merely probable doubt but a fair doubt based upon reason and common sense,” as asserted by the court.
Mansoor Ahmad Malik, previously sentenced to two years in jail in FIR No.26/2009 of Police Station VOK, expressed relief as the court found him not guilty of an offence under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
JK High Court Acquits Employee, Emphasizes Strong Evidence Requirement:In case of rectification of any error in article , Visit on Correction Policy & Register your Query:
Latest Posts
- West Bengal: Case Filed Against Former CM Mamata Banerjee Over 2025 Ganda Dharma Remark
May 27, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - Women Empowerment: Assam Assembly Passes Resolution For 33% Women’s Reservation
May 26, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - United States Military Lanches Fresh Strikes In Iran, Bandar Abaas Reportedly Targetted
May 26, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Telangana Heatstroke Toll Reaches 16, Compensation Awarded
May 25, 2026 | Breaking News - Hike in Petrol and Diesel Prices, Petrol Reaches Rs 102.12 Per Litre in Delhi
May 25, 2026 | Breaking News, India, World - Mamata Banerjee Alleges Election Data Hacking After BJP’s West Bengal Victory
May 25, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - United States & India Share Strategic Alliance; Marco Rubio Tells S Jaishankar
May 24, 2026 | Breaking News, India, World - Pakistan Train Blast: 24 Killed, Baloch Liberation Army Claims Responsibility for Attack
May 24, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Liushenyu Coal Mine Blast Kills At Least 90 Workers, President Xi Jinping Urges Workplace Safety
May 24, 2026 | Breaking News, World - India-Canada Eyes $50 Billion Trade Goal, Minister Piyush Goyal Heads to Canada
May 23, 2026 | Breaking News, India, World