
JK High Court Acquits Employee, Emphasizes Strong Evidence Requirement.image/KL
JK High Court Acquits Employee, Emphasizes Strong Evidence Requirement
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court, encompassing Ladakh, has nullified the conviction and two-year imprisonment of a government employee, emphasizing the need for robust evidence and recognizing the substantial distinction between ‘could be true’ and ‘must be true.’
Mansoor Ahmad Malik, an employee facing a two-year jail sentence, had his conviction overturned by the High Court. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul, heading the court, granted approval to Malik’s appeal, asserting that the prosecution failed to establish the demand for illegal gratification. Originally sentenced in connection with a 2009 corruption case, Malik was acquitted under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul, leading the bench, declared, “The prosecution has failed to prove clearly and explicitly the demand for illegal gratification.” The court emphasized that “suspicion, no matter how strong, cannot and must not be permitted to take the place of proof.”
Underlining the judicial responsibility in criminal cases, the bench commented, “The significant gap between ‘may be’ true and ‘must be’ true must be bridged through clear, cogent, and unimpeachable evidence presented by the prosecution before an accused is pronounced as a convict.” The court underscored the importance of maintaining a substantial distance between mere conjectures and definite conclusions through impartial judicial scrutiny.
“If the facts and circumstances of a case necessitate it, then the benefit of the doubt must be accorded to the accused.” It clarified that a reasonable doubt is “not an imaginary, trivial, or merely probable doubt but a fair doubt based upon reason and common sense,” as asserted by the court.
Mansoor Ahmad Malik, previously sentenced to two years in jail in FIR No.26/2009 of Police Station VOK, expressed relief as the court found him not guilty of an offence under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
JK High Court Acquits Employee, Emphasizes Strong Evidence Requirement:In case of rectification of any error in article , Visit on Correction Policy & Register your Query:
Latest Posts
- Vishwesh Negi Appointed India’s Next Ambassador to Iran
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - Leader of Opposition Udhayanidhi Stalin Arrested by Chennai Police Over Controversial Remarks on Actor Trisha
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - Pakistan Blocks Al Jazeera Reportedly After Coverage of PoK Protests, Electoral Process
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, World - US Acknowledges Strikes Failed to Pressure Iran, Military Seeks New Strategies
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Hormuz Shipping Remains Slow as Oil Prices Fall on Renewed Hopes of US-Iran Talks
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Nifty 50 Likely to Open in Red After Sharp Previous Session Rally
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, Stock Market - Brown University President Christina Paxson to Step Down After Clash With Trump Administration
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - US State Department Plans Closure of Diplomatic Posts in Canada, Japan, Indonesia, Cameroon and Grenada: Report
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Amazon Market Value Crosses $3 Trillion for First Time as Shares Surge 5%
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, Markets - Pacific Nation Nauru Changes Name to Republic of Naoero; Adopts Native-Language Identity
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World