
JK High Court Acquits Employee, Emphasizes Strong Evidence Requirement.image/KL
JK High Court Acquits Employee, Emphasizes Strong Evidence Requirement
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court, encompassing Ladakh, has nullified the conviction and two-year imprisonment of a government employee, emphasizing the need for robust evidence and recognizing the substantial distinction between ‘could be true’ and ‘must be true.’
Mansoor Ahmad Malik, an employee facing a two-year jail sentence, had his conviction overturned by the High Court. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul, heading the court, granted approval to Malik’s appeal, asserting that the prosecution failed to establish the demand for illegal gratification. Originally sentenced in connection with a 2009 corruption case, Malik was acquitted under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul, leading the bench, declared, “The prosecution has failed to prove clearly and explicitly the demand for illegal gratification.” The court emphasized that “suspicion, no matter how strong, cannot and must not be permitted to take the place of proof.”
Underlining the judicial responsibility in criminal cases, the bench commented, “The significant gap between ‘may be’ true and ‘must be’ true must be bridged through clear, cogent, and unimpeachable evidence presented by the prosecution before an accused is pronounced as a convict.” The court underscored the importance of maintaining a substantial distance between mere conjectures and definite conclusions through impartial judicial scrutiny.
“If the facts and circumstances of a case necessitate it, then the benefit of the doubt must be accorded to the accused.” It clarified that a reasonable doubt is “not an imaginary, trivial, or merely probable doubt but a fair doubt based upon reason and common sense,” as asserted by the court.
Mansoor Ahmad Malik, previously sentenced to two years in jail in FIR No.26/2009 of Police Station VOK, expressed relief as the court found him not guilty of an offence under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
JK High Court Acquits Employee, Emphasizes Strong Evidence Requirement:In case of rectification of any error in article , Visit on Correction Policy & Register your Query:
Latest Posts
- Bangladesh-India Ties Could Be Improved, Says Adviser Zahed Ur Rahman
July 8, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Typhoon Maysak Triggers Deadly Floods in China, 15 Killed and Thousands Evacuated
July 7, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Bangladesh Says No Country Should Worry About Teesta Project Amid India’s Concerns
July 7, 2026 | Breaking News, India, World - US to Review Sale of F-35 Jets to Turkey, Trump Suggests Easing Sanctions
July 7, 2026 | Breaking News, World - 5 Killed, 1 Critically Injured in SUV-Truck Collision in Maihar Madhya Pradesh
July 7, 2026 | Breaking News, India - India-Indonesia Ties: PM Modi Praises Biju Patnaik for His Crucial Role in Indonesia’s Fight for Independence During Jakarta Visit
July 7, 2026 | Breaking News, India, World - Meta, Google Tell Delhi High Court They Cannot Proactively Remove Unauthorised Court Videos
July 7, 2026 | Breaking News, India - Maharashtra Rains: Death Toll Rises as IMD Issues Alerts, Mumbai Faces Severe Disruptions
July 7, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Weather - Gujarat Court Upholds Death Sentence For 38 convicts In 2008 Ahmedabad Blasts Case
July 7, 2026 | Breaking News, India - Jammu Kashmir: Entire Staff of Ramban School Suspended After Student Found Locked Inside Building
July 7, 2026 | Breaking News, Jammu Kashmir, Ramban