
Allahabad HC Halts Demolition Order in Deoria Land Dispute Case
Allahabad HC Halts Demolition Order in Deoria Land Dispute Case
In a significant development, the Allahabad High Court has intervened to stay the demolition order issued by a revenue official in Deoria district regarding the house of the late Prem Chand Yadav. Prem Chand Yadav was among the six individuals recently killed in a tragic land dispute. On October 11, the tehsildar of Deoria issued an order for the demolition of the house that once belonged to the former district panchayat member, Prem Chand Yadav. The order was contested by Ram Bhawan Yadav, the father of the deceased.
The horrific incident unfolded on October 2 when 50-year-old Prem Chand Yadav was brutally attacked with sharp-edged weapons, resulting in his death. His assailant was Satyaprakash Dubey and members of his family, who launched the deadly attack as Yadav returned to his house.
In retaliation, Prem Chand’s supporters subsequently stormed Dubey’s residence, leading to the brutal killing of Satyaprakash Dubey and five of his family members, including children.
Justice Chandra Kumar Rai of the Allahabad High Court took cognizance of the matter and issued an order in response to an appeal filed by Ram Bhawan Yadav against the demolition order. The petitioner’s counsel contended that the authorities were determined to demolish the house, despite the fact that Ram Bhawan had not yet pursued the appeal process under Section 67(5) of the UP Revenue Code, 2006.
The counsel further argued that even on merit, the contested order could not be upheld, as it had been issued without affording a proper opportunity for a hearing, and without conducting a thorough survey and demarcation.
The Chief Standing Counsel for the State, JN Maurya, asserted that the disputed land was recorded as ‘khalihan,’ implying that there was no need for external intervention.
In its ruling, the court directed that the order for demolition and damages, passed by the tehsildar on October 11, should not be executed until the disposal of the petitioner’s appeal under Section 67(5) of UP Revenue Code, 2006.
Furthermore, the court disposed of the writ petition, instructing the petitioner to file an appeal before the Collector against the contested order within two weeks from the date of the ruling. The court stipulated that if the appeal was filed within the specified timeframe, it would be registered and addressed in accordance with the law.
Latest Posts
- Bihar CM Nitish Kumar to Take Rajya Sabha Oath; Deputies to Attend
April 10, 2026 | Breaking News, India - BSNL leads fixed-line internet in India in 2026
April 9, 2026 | Press Release, Telecom - Spain Condemn Israeli Strikes in Lebanon and Restores Embassy in Tehran in Diplomatic Move
April 9, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - United States Vice President JD Vance to Lead Talks in Islamabad as Donald Trump Sends Team
April 9, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - World Bank Raises India Growth Forecast to 6.6% for FY27, Warns of Middle East Risks
April 9, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Indian Economy - Amid Harsh Weather, Schools Closed in Doda, Kishtwar, Ramban, Reasi
April 8, 2026 | Breaking News - Iran Agrees to Open Strait Of Hormuz After China’s Intervention, President Trump Accepts the Two-Week Ceasefire
April 8, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Bayer US head says tariffs will not affect its 2026 forecasts
April 7, 2026 | Breaking News - China and Russia veto UN resolution on protecting Hormuz shipping
April 7, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Doppler Weather Radar to Be Installed in Doda; Fresh Tender Soon for Sudhmahadev Tunnel Says, Union Minister Dr. Jitendra Singh
April 7, 2026 | Breaking News, Doda, Jammu Kashmir