
Punjab and Haryana High Court Urges Amicable Settlement in ‘Delhi Chalo’ March Case
Punjab and Haryana High Court Urges Amicable Settlement in ‘Delhi Chalo’ March Case
Court Calls for Balancing Fundamental Rights and Maintaining Law and Order
In a hearing on petitions related to the ‘Delhi Chalo’ march by farmers, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has called for an amicable settlement. The court emphasized the need for a balance between the farmers’ right to protest and the public’s right to free movement. It urged all parties to identify specific areas for peaceful protests, emphasizing that the use of force should be the last resort. The court sought a status report from the Centre, Punjab, Haryana, and Delhi governments on the ongoing protest. The matter is adjourned till Thursday.
Differing Petitions Addressed by the Court
Two PILs Presented
The court addressed two PILs regarding the farmers’ protest—one highlighting the violation of the right to free movement and the other emphasizing the inconvenience caused by the march. The first petition argued that preventing farmers from reaching Delhi violates their democratic rights, while the second expressed concerns about the public’s inconvenience and urged that no one should block national highways.
Government Responses
Centre Ready for Negotiations
The Centre stated its readiness for negotiations, including discussing the farmers’ demand for a law on minimum support price (MSP). The Haryana government explained its actions, citing the need to maintain law and order, especially considering past incidents during farmers’ protests. The Punjab government acknowledged the merit in farmers’ demands and assured arrangements for peaceful protests.
Court’s Stand and Future Actions
Balancing Rights and Ensuring Law and Order
The court emphasized the importance of balancing the farmers’ right to protest with the state’s duty to maintain law and order. It urged Punjab and Haryana to designate specific protest areas, emphasizing the rights of both protesters and the general public. The court adjourned the matter to Thursday, calling for an amicable resolution before then.
Investigations are ongoing regarding the farmers’ protest, with reports of the use of drones and the deployment of tear gas. The court’s stance aims to address the concerns raised while promoting a peaceful resolution.
Latest Posts
- Doda East MLA Mehraj Malik Not Allowed to Hold Jammu Kashmir Statehood Protest at Jantar Mantar
June 22, 2026 | Breaking News, Doda, Jammu Kashmir, Politics - Iran’s Negotiations Led By Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf Left Switzerland after 18 hours on Iran-US Talks
June 22, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - 54 Injured, 18 Missing After Fire Struck Ras Laffan industrial area of Qatar
June 22, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Top Actor Allu Arjun To Appear Virtually In Pushpa 2 Stampade Case
June 22, 2026 | Breaking News, Entertainment, India - Strait of Hormuz Traffic Falls as Iran Responds to Israeli Strikes in Lebanon, States Maritime Intelligence Firm Windward
June 22, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Jailed MP Engineer Rashid Wants to Step Down; Awami Ittehad Party Consults Cadres
June 22, 2026 | Breaking News, Jammu Kashmir, Politics - Tushar Mehta Gets Fresh Three-Year Term as Solicitor General of India
June 22, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - Pakistan Defence Minister Khawaja Asif Issues Strong Warning Following Indus Treaty Suspension
June 22, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics, World - Gujarat Police Arrest 1992 Radhika Gymkhana Massacre Convict After Seven Years on the Run
June 22, 2026 | Breaking News, India - US-Iran Talks LIVE Updates: First Day Covers Lebanon, Hormuz, frozen assets
June 22, 2026 | Live Updates, Politics, World