
JK Court Grants Bail to Former Policeman After 18-Year Custody
JK Court Grants Bail to Former Policeman After 18-Year Custody
SRINAGAR :- The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has granted bail to a former policeman who was arrested in 2006 for murdering a man and projecting him as a militant. Justice Atul Sreedharan expressed shock at the protracted trial, noting that only 28 out of 72 witnesses had been examined over the past seventeen years.
Justice Sreedharan remarked on the severe delay, calling it a clear violation of Article 21, which guarantees the right to a speedy trial. “This Court is astounded by the facts of this case. This is a clear cut case of violation of Article 21 on account of delayed trial.
The trial is delayed at the stage of prosecution witnesses. The State is unable to show how the delay could be attributed to the applicant,” stated the judge in the order dated July 3.
The 56-year-old accused, Bansi Lal, sought bail through his wife this year. His counsel highlighted that Lal had been in judicial custody for the past 18 years, with only a few months out on bail during this period. Considering these circumstances, the Court decided to grant bail and ordered Lal’s immediate release.
Court Orders Immediate Release on Bail
The Court’s order specified, “The applicant is to be released on bail forthwith upon furnishing personal bond of ₹50,000 and one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Registrar Judicial.”
The case against Lal and other police officials originated from a fake encounter incident in 2006, initially registered at Sumbal Police Station in the Kashmir valley. Last year, the trial was shifted to Jammu after the State did not “seriously oppose” a joint petition by four accused, including Lal.
Legal Representation and Trial Proceedings
Senior Advocate Sunil Seth and advocate Shanum Gupta represented the accused, while Deputy Advocate General PD Singh represented the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.
This case highlights significant issues within the judicial system, particularly the excessive delays that can infringe on fundamental rights. The Court’s decision to grant bail underscores the importance of timely justice and the protection of individual rights as enshrined in the Constitution.
Latest Posts
- US Senate Rebukes Trump on Iran; Approves Resolution Directing Withdrawal Of US Forces
June 24, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Marco Rubio Rejects Iranian Toll Plans for Strait of Hormuz; New Frictions Emerge in US-Iran Talks
June 24, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Iran-US War LIVE Updates June 24, 2026: Iran & US Delivers Conflicting Statements on Nuclear Oversight & Charge Tolls
June 24, 2026 | Breaking News, Live Updates, Politics, World - Instagram and Facebook Down, Users Unable to Access the Services
June 24, 2026 | Breaking News, World - India’s sustainable aviation fuel costs 40% less: UC Berkeley Report
June 24, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Press Release - India Ranks 13th in AI Readiness
June 24, 2026 | AI & ML, Featured by VoM, World - Mareechika OTT Release: Where to Watch the Telugu Mystery Crime Thriller Online?
June 24, 2026 | Entertainment, Entertainment Alerts - Sugar Season 2 OTT Release: Where to Watch Colin Farrell’s Sci-Fi Thriller Series
June 23, 2026 | Entertainment, Entertainment Alerts - Manithan Deivamagalam Now Available For Streaming Online: What You Need to Know
June 23, 2026 | Entertainment, Entertainment Alerts - Bangladesh-China Relations in Focus as PM Tarique Rahman Starts Official Visit
June 23, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World