
Pak Judge Steps Down from Case Alleging External Interference
Pak Judge Steps Down from Case Alleging External Interference
Justice Yahya Afridi, one of the judges on the seven-member bench examining allegations of Pakistan intelligence agencies meddling in judicial matters, has stepped down from the suo motu case being heard by the Supreme Court, according to a report by Geo News. His recusal was mentioned in a note accompanying the written order issued after the initial hearing.
Justice Afridi highlighted that the issues outlined in the letter from Islamabad High Court (IHC) judges should be assessed in line with the code of conduct of the Supreme Judicial Council. He emphasized the independence of high courts under the constitution, suggesting that invoking Article 184/3 could jeopardize this independence.
Pak Judge Steps Down from Case:Independence of High Courts at Stake
The seven-member bench, presided over by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa, includes six other judges: Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel, Justice Athar Minallah, Justice Musarrat Hilali, and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan. Chief Justice Isa has underscored the seriousness of the issue, affirming the Supreme Court’s commitment to preserving judicial autonomy.
Death Toll rises to 18 in Pakistan Truck Crash
In his note, Justice Yahya expressed concerns that while the suo motu notice was initiated with good intentions, it could potentially undermine the independence of high courts and their chief justices. Justice Athar Minallah appended an additional note, expressing reservations about certain paragraphs of the written order. He pointed to the possibility of political interference in cases and referenced past instances where such interference was acknowledged by the court.
Pak Judge Steps Down from Case:Judges as Whistleblowers
Describing the IHC judges as “whistleblowers,” Justice Minallah stressed the seriousness of the issues raised in their letter. He noted that despite their repeated attempts to address the matter through appropriate channels, there was a lack of response from relevant institutions. The judges’ actions, he argued, were in line with their oath-bound duty, and there is no basis to doubt their integrity.
The letter from six IHC judges, including Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Justice Babar Sattar, Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir, Justice Tariq Mahmood Jehangiri, Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan, and Justice Saman Rifat Imtiaz, called for a Judicial Convention to address concerns regarding intelligence agency interference in judicial functions. Following the circulation of the letter and the gravity of its allegations, Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa convened a meeting to address the concerns raised by the judges.
Latest Posts
- India Objects to Incorrect Map at Bangladesh Seminar, Reaffirms Jammu and Kashmir Is Integral Part of India
July 10, 2026 | Breaking News, India, World - After WhatsApp, Telegram Replies to Government on Username Feature: Report
July 10, 2026 | Breaking News, India - Balochistan Bloodbath Exposes Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir’s Security Failure; Islamabad Accuses India
July 10, 2026 | Breaking News, Pakistan News, World - OpenAI Launches GPT-5.6 After US Scrutiny, CEO Sam Altman Says ‘Made Many Changes’
July 9, 2026 | AI & ML, Artificial Intelligence, Breaking News, Technology - Chancellor Friedrich Merz Says United States Will Supply Tomahawk Missiles to Germany
July 9, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Middle East Tensions Rise as Israel Threatens Iran With Greater Force
July 9, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - US Strike Targeted Bushehr Nuclear Plant Perimeter, Says Iranian Official
July 9, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - US Military Base in Jordan Hit by 10 Iranian Ballistic Missiles
July 9, 2026 | Breaking News - 28 Killed in Shoe Factory Fire in Eastern China
July 9, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Oral Biolife Appoints Thomas J Corrigan as Vice President of Finance
July 9, 2026 | Press Release