
Manish Sisodia Seeks Supreme Court Review on Bail Denial
Manish Sisodia Seeks Supreme Court Review on Bail Denial
Former Delhi deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia has filed a review petition in the Supreme Court, challenging its decision to deny him bail in the alleged Delhi excise policy scam involving corruption and money laundering charges. The Supreme Court, in its October 30 order, had tentatively supported the accusation against Sisodia of facilitating “windfall gains” of Rs 338 crore to wholesale liquor dealers based on evidence presented.
Key Accusations and Court’s Observations
The bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and SVN Bhatti, acknowledged that several charges by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) were debatable. However, it noted a clear charge under the PML Act, citing the CBI’s charge sheet. The charge sheet alleged that the 7% excess commission earned by distributors, amounting to Rs 338 crore, constituted an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The bench asserted that this sum, earned within ten months, represented the proceeds of crime, intending to provide significant gains to selected distributors in exchange for kickbacks and bribes.
Sisodia’s Arrest and Allegations
Manish Sisodia was arrested by the CBI on February 26 for his alleged involvement in the scam and has been in custody since then. The ED later arrested him on March 9 in a money-laundering case linked to the CBI FIR. Sisodia, who also held the excise portfolio, resigned from the Delhi cabinet on February 28, following the controversy surrounding the excise policy implemented in November 2021 but scrapped in September 2022 amid corruption allegations.
Investigation and Controversy Over New Policy
The investigating agencies have accused the new excise policy of resulting in cartelisation and favoring ineligible entities for liquor licenses for monetary gains. However, the Delhi government and Sisodia have refuted these allegations, maintaining that the policy aimed to increase revenue.
Sisodia’s review petition in the Supreme Court is a critical step in this high-profile case, which has significant political and legal implications.
Latest Posts
- Women Empowerment: Assam Assembly Passes Resolution For 33% Women’s Reservation
May 26, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - United States Military Lanches Fresh Strikes In Iran, Bandar Abaas Reportedly Targetted
May 26, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Telangana Heatstroke Toll Reaches 16, Compensation Awarded
May 25, 2026 | Breaking News - Hike in Petrol and Diesel Prices, Petrol Reaches Rs 102.12 Per Litre in Delhi
May 25, 2026 | Breaking News, India, World - Mamata Banerjee Alleges Election Data Hacking After BJP’s West Bengal Victory
May 25, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - United States & India Share Strategic Alliance; Marco Rubio Tells S Jaishankar
May 24, 2026 | Breaking News, India, World - Pakistan Train Blast: 24 Killed, Baloch Liberation Army Claims Responsibility for Attack
May 24, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Liushenyu Coal Mine Blast Kills At Least 90 Workers, President Xi Jinping Urges Workplace Safety
May 24, 2026 | Breaking News, World - India-Canada Eyes $50 Billion Trade Goal, Minister Piyush Goyal Heads to Canada
May 23, 2026 | Breaking News, India, World - Iran-US Talks Heading Positively, Both Countries Ahead for Ending Middle East Conflict
May 23, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World