
UP Elections 2027: Allahabad High Court Stays Murder Conviction of BJP Worker Nandlal Rai
The Allahabad High Court has stayed the conviction and sentence of a man convicted in a 2017 murder case after noting that he wished to contest the 2027 Uttar Pradesh assembly election either as an independent candidate or, if possible, on a BJP ticket.
A two-judge bench comprising Justice Siddharth and Justice Vinai Kumar Dwivedi passed the order hearing a criminal appeal filed by Nandlal Rai alias Babloo Rai, who was convicted by the Varanasi sessions court in 2025 in connection with a 2017 murder case which was registered at Sigra police station.
The court granted bail to the appellant, noting that he was a political figure and an active Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) worker before his conviction.
“Keeping in view the right to livelihood of a common man which is not less important than the right to contest election by a politician, conviction and sentence of appellant deserves to be stayed so that he may be able to survive for hearing the final verdict in his above noted appeal,” the court added.
In the order dated October 5, the high court referred to a Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Afjal Ansari vs. State of Uttar Pradesh to observe that the top court had stayed the conviction of a number of public representatives while holding that the “politicians bear special duty towards their constituents and failure to secure stay of conviction may lead to loss of opportunity to contest election and granted stay of conviction to the politicians/ legislators”.
The accused-appellant had sought bail and a stay of conviction on the ground that he had not been named in the FIR and that his alleged involvement was disclosed only around 17 days after the FIR was lodged.
The case pertained to the murder of Pramod Kumar Nigam, an active member of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement. The accused-appellant was associated with gangster-turned-politician Mukhtar Ansari and he allegedly murdered Nigam over a minor dispute.
During the course of the hearing, his counsel also argued that Nigam, the deceased, was politically active and Rai was implicated merely on suspicion and conjecture.
After considering the submissions of the parties and the circumstances of the case, the high court said that the appellant’s conviction and sentence deserved to be stayed during the pendency of the appeal.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by VoM News staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Latest Posts
- Columbia University Graduate Mahmoud Khalil Appeals to US Supreme Court to Block Re-Arrest and Deportation Under Trump Administration20 Oct 2026
- Bomb Threat Delays IndiGo Chennai-Goa Flight 6E588 by Nearly Five Hours, Passengers Evacuated | Investigation Underway20 Oct 2026
- Japan Launches World-First Mission To Moon Of Mars20 Oct 2026
- Is Something Cooking! US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth Makes Surprise Visit to Israel, Met PM Benjamin Netanyahu20 Oct 2026
- Illegal Gold Mine Landslide in Colombia Kills 14, Injures Seven20 Oct 2026
- BREAKING: India, US Set for High-Level Talks; US Secretary of State Marco Rubio Begins Three-Day India Visit20 Oct 2026
- Mireya Blavia de Cisneros faces fresh scrutiny over claims of a multibillion-dollar inheritance power grab20 Oct 2026
- BREAKING: France Protests 2026; Night Curfews Imposed in Four Cities After Violent Protests19 Oct 2026
- BREAKING: GREF Porter Killed, 3 Critically Injured in Poonch Landslide19 Oct 2026
- Indian Embassy in Italy Issues Advisory Amid Protests, Urges Nationals to Avoid Crowded Areas19 Oct 2026
