
Heavy Goods Licence Holder Can Drive Passenger Vehicle: Jammu Kashmir High Court
The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh has held that a person holding a driving licence for a ‘Heavy Goods Vehicle’ is legally competent to drive a passenger vehicle, citing the 1994 amendment which unified all commercial vehicles under the ‘transport vehicle’ category.
Watch our Correspondent’s Video Report
Justice Mohammad Yousuf Wani passed the ruling while dismissing an appeal filed by the National Insurance Company Ltd, which had challenged a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) award dated February 6, 2014, arguing that the driver lacked a specific endorsement to drive a Passenger Service Vehicle (PSV).Kashmir cultural experiences
The Court clarified that Section 10(2)(e) of the Motor Vehicle Act, after the 1994 amendment, merged the classifications of commercial vehicles into a single category — ‘transport vehicle’ — thereby making a person with a heavy goods vehicle licence eligible to drive any commercial vehicle, including passenger carriers.
“Any person holding a driving licence to drive a heavy goods vehicle would be competent to drive a passenger-carrying vehicle as well,” the Court observed.
The insurer had also contested the MACT’s award of 7.5 per cent interest as excessive and objected to the closure of evidence proceedings without the examination of certain witnesses. However, the Court dismissed all arguments as devoid of merit.
Also Read: Asian Paints opens 8 new décor stores in Kashmir
The Court also rejected the insurer’s reliance on a previous case, Bashir Ahmed Chopan, terming it per incuriam and instead upheld the legal reasoning laid down in National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Mohd. Sadiq Kuchay, where a Division Bench had ruled that PSV endorsements are not mandatory under J&K Motor Vehicle Rules.
The bench ordered that the compensation amount, already deposited by the insurance company in compliance with a 2014 interim order, be released to the claimants as per the original award.
Advocates Dinesh Singh Chauhan and Damini Singh Chauhan represented the appellants. (JKNS)
Latest Posts
- US believes Iran hasn’t decided to build a nuclear weapon
October 11, 2024 | Breaking News, United States of America, World - Entertainment Shake-Up: Netflix Nears $83 Billion Acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery
December 5, 2025 | Breaking News, Tech - Bilateral Trade Between India and Russia to Reach $100 Billion, Putin Says
December 5, 2025 | Breaking News, World - Putin Ordered 2018 Novichok Poisoning Of Ex-Russian Spy: UK Inquiry
December 5, 2025 | Breaking News, World - MoneyHero and Coinbase Jointly Publish Pulse of Crypto — Singapore 2025 Survey Report
November 20, 2025 | Breaking News, World - Kwikset Honored in SecurityInfoWatch.com Readers’ Choice Awards
November 18, 2025 | World - RapidAI Earns FDA Clearance for Rapid Aortic, Bringing AI-Driven Aortic Measurements and Surveillance to Care Teams
November 18, 2025 | AI & ML, Breaking News, World - Valeura Implements New Share Buyback Programme
November 18, 2025 | Breaking News, Business - Russian Strikes Kill Five In Ukraine, Destroy Kindergarten
November 17, 2025 | Breaking News, World - In 453-Page Ruling, Bangladesh Court Hands Death Sentence To Sheikh Hasina
November 17, 2025 | Breaking News, Politics, World - 18 Members Of Hyderabad Family – 3 Generations – Killed In Saudi Bus Crash
November 17, 2025 | Breaking News, India
