
Heavy Goods Licence Holder Can Drive Passenger Vehicle: Jammu Kashmir High Court
The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh has held that a person holding a driving licence for a ‘Heavy Goods Vehicle’ is legally competent to drive a passenger vehicle, citing the 1994 amendment which unified all commercial vehicles under the ‘transport vehicle’ category.
Watch our Correspondent’s Video Report
Justice Mohammad Yousuf Wani passed the ruling while dismissing an appeal filed by the National Insurance Company Ltd, which had challenged a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) award dated February 6, 2014, arguing that the driver lacked a specific endorsement to drive a Passenger Service Vehicle (PSV).Kashmir cultural experiences
The Court clarified that Section 10(2)(e) of the Motor Vehicle Act, after the 1994 amendment, merged the classifications of commercial vehicles into a single category — ‘transport vehicle’ — thereby making a person with a heavy goods vehicle licence eligible to drive any commercial vehicle, including passenger carriers.
“Any person holding a driving licence to drive a heavy goods vehicle would be competent to drive a passenger-carrying vehicle as well,” the Court observed.
The insurer had also contested the MACT’s award of 7.5 per cent interest as excessive and objected to the closure of evidence proceedings without the examination of certain witnesses. However, the Court dismissed all arguments as devoid of merit.
Also Read: Asian Paints opens 8 new décor stores in Kashmir
The Court also rejected the insurer’s reliance on a previous case, Bashir Ahmed Chopan, terming it per incuriam and instead upheld the legal reasoning laid down in National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Mohd. Sadiq Kuchay, where a Division Bench had ruled that PSV endorsements are not mandatory under J&K Motor Vehicle Rules.
The bench ordered that the compensation amount, already deposited by the insurance company in compliance with a 2014 interim order, be released to the claimants as per the original award.
Advocates Dinesh Singh Chauhan and Damini Singh Chauhan represented the appellants. (JKNS)
Latest Posts
- 10 Dead, 25 Injured In School Shooting In Canada’s British Columbia
February 11, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Two Co-Founders Of Elon Musk’s xAI Resign, Joining Exodus
February 11, 2026 | AI & ML, Breaking News, World - Pakistan Was “Used And Discarded” By US After Afghan Wars: Defence Minister Khawaja Asif
February 11, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Stratbeans Launches Off-The-Shelf (OTS) Course Library for Rapid, Scalable Enterprise Learning
February 11, 2026 | Business, India - TimBuckDo Closes ₹2.70 Crore Funding Round Backed by Industry Titans and VCs After National TV Showcase on Ideabaaz
February 11, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, India - Women earn 11.5% less than men in STEM careers, study reveals
February 11, 2026 | Articles/Editorials, Featured by VoM - Aam Aadmi Party MP Raghav Chadha Urges Government To Legalise And Regulate Virtual Digital Assets
February 11, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - ‘Vande Mataram’ To Be Played Before National Anthem At Government Events, Schools: Centre
February 11, 2026 | Breaking News, India - India Rises To 91st Spot In Corruption Perceptions Index 2025
February 11, 2026 | Breaking News, India - Babri Masjid Replica Construction to Begin in Murshidabad Today; Quran Recitation Planned
February 11, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics
