Court Denies Bail to Groom in Dowry Demand Case

Court Denies Bail to Groom in Dowry Demand Case
Court Denies Bail to Groom in Dowry Demand Case
Court Denies Bail to Groom in Dowry Demand Case
Court Denies Bail to Groom in Dowry Demand Case

Court Denies Bail to Groom in Dowry Demand Case

Court Denies Bail to Groom in Dowry Demand Case

Impact on Society and Moral Values

A Jammu and Kashmir court has recently denied bail to a man arrested for allegedly making dowry demands and failing to attend his wedding reception, which was scheduled four years after his nikah to the bride.

The Allegations and Wedding Reception

According to a police complaint, the man’s absence at the reception was due to alleged dowry demands made by his family, demands which were unmet by the bride’s family. The wedding reception, referred to as the “departure ceremony” in the order, was planned for September 2023 in Kashmir’s Awantipora, four years after the nikah took place.

Docter Dies Seven Injured in Kashmir Road accident

Bride’s Perspective and Legal Consequences

The bride claimed that prior to setting the date for the reception, the groom had persuaded her to engage in a physical relationship since the nikah had already taken place. She believed him to be her husband and met with him accordingly, as stated in court. However, on the day of the reception, the bride’s family was informed that the groom and his family would not attend unless they received Rs 20 lakh in cash and a car as dowry. This led to charges against the groom and his father for cheating and cruelty to women under the Indian Penal Code, as well as violations of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Legal Proceedings and Denial of Bail

The accused individuals contested these allegations and insisted that a false complaint had been made against them. They argued for their release on bail, citing Supreme Court guidelines. However, the judge, Additional Special Mobile Magistrate Shahber Ayaz, refused bail, expressing concerns about the potential impact of the case on society and its threat to moral values. The court also noted that the case was still in the early stages of investigation, and more severe charges could potentially be added.

In a related development, the complainant’s lawyer argued that the offense of rape might apply in this case, as the groom had allegedly persuaded the complainant to engage in a physical relationship on a “false promise of marriage.” Considering these factors, the Court dismissed the bail application of the groom and his father.

This decision highlights the gravity of the case and its implications for societal values and the legal consequences of dowry-related demands. The case will continue to be closely monitored as it proceeds through the legal system.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Telegram
WhatsApp
Email
Note: You have to fill-up above all respective field, then click below button for send your message