
Beliefs should be in conformity with constitution: Supreme Court
Beliefs should be in conformity with constitution: Supreme Court
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday said in a democracy there was always space for different ideologies but those beliefs had to be in conformity with the Constitution.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan made the remark while refusing to entertain a PIL by an advocate seeking directions to the Centre and Bar Council of India, stating those contesting elections of bar bodies should not be a member of a political party.
“In democracy, there is always scope for different ideologies but that should be in conformity with the Constitution. There is no law, which prohibits an active member of a political party to contest the election of bar bodies. You want us to enact a law. Sorry, it can’t be done,” the bench said.
Senior advocate Sirajuddin, appearing for PIL petitioner advocate Jaya Sukin, said if the contesting candidates were allowed to be active members of political parties, they would push for their elections.
The bench, however, remarked, “If an office-bearer of the Bar has a political ideology, what’s wrong with that? You want to oust Mr Kapil Sibal as the president of SCBA (Supreme Court Bar Association)? You want to oust (Manan Kumar) Mishra (Rajya Sabha member from Bihar) as the chairman of the Bar Council of India?” Justice Surya Kant referred to the contributions of legal luminary Ram Jethmalani, noting the late stalwart held the post of Bar Council of India chairperson and served as the president of the SCBA.
Also Read : SUV overturned in Chattisgarh; Three killed, Two hurt
“He was also in Parliament and was affiliated with different political parties. Do you want the country to be deprived of the views and contribution of these brilliant multi-talented persons? Bar bodies are a group of elite members of the society. We don’t think that association with political parties will have any effect,” the bench underlined.
The top court further asked when the statute was silent on this issue, how could it ask a person, associated with a political party, not to contest elections of a bar body.
“In our opinion, you should also join some political party and have some experience,” Justice Kant said in lighter vein.
Sensing the mood of the court, Sirajuddin sought a direction to refer the issue to the Law Commission, but the bench said it was not going to pass any such direction and allowed the petitioner to withdraw the plea.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by VoM News staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Latest Posts
- J&K High Court Adjourns Hearing in AAP MLA Mehraj Malik’s PSA Detention Case to February 19
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Jammu Kashmir, Politics - Madras High Court Directs MS Dhoni to Deposit ₹10 Lakh in Defamation Case Against Ex-IPS Officer
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Sports - T20 World Cup 2026: Pakistan Spinner Usman Tariq Responds to Action Criticism, Says India Will Face ‘Extra Pressure’
February 12, 2026 | Sports - Athar Amin Zargar Appointed Additional Secretary in Jammu Kashmir Home Department
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Doda, Jammu Kashmir - NATO upgrades Brussels HQ broadcast studio with Grass Valley LDX 135 cameras
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, World - Rx Propellant appoints Ashish Singh as CEO & Managing Director
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, India - Bangladesh Election 2026: Voting Begins Amid Security Alert, Minority Concerns
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Instagram Denies Addiction Claims In Landmark US Trial
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Mauganj – Madhya Pradesh: BJP MLA Pradeep Patel Missing From Public View For Nearly A Month
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - Centre Opposes Release Of Sonam Wangchuk; Supreme Court Examines Preventive Detention Law
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics
