
JK High Court Acquits Employee, Emphasizes Strong Evidence Requirement.image/KL
JK High Court Acquits Employee, Emphasizes Strong Evidence Requirement
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court, encompassing Ladakh, has nullified the conviction and two-year imprisonment of a government employee, emphasizing the need for robust evidence and recognizing the substantial distinction between ‘could be true’ and ‘must be true.’
Mansoor Ahmad Malik, an employee facing a two-year jail sentence, had his conviction overturned by the High Court. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul, heading the court, granted approval to Malik’s appeal, asserting that the prosecution failed to establish the demand for illegal gratification. Originally sentenced in connection with a 2009 corruption case, Malik was acquitted under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul, leading the bench, declared, “The prosecution has failed to prove clearly and explicitly the demand for illegal gratification.” The court emphasized that “suspicion, no matter how strong, cannot and must not be permitted to take the place of proof.”
Underlining the judicial responsibility in criminal cases, the bench commented, “The significant gap between ‘may be’ true and ‘must be’ true must be bridged through clear, cogent, and unimpeachable evidence presented by the prosecution before an accused is pronounced as a convict.” The court underscored the importance of maintaining a substantial distance between mere conjectures and definite conclusions through impartial judicial scrutiny.
“If the facts and circumstances of a case necessitate it, then the benefit of the doubt must be accorded to the accused.” It clarified that a reasonable doubt is “not an imaginary, trivial, or merely probable doubt but a fair doubt based upon reason and common sense,” as asserted by the court.
Mansoor Ahmad Malik, previously sentenced to two years in jail in FIR No.26/2009 of Police Station VOK, expressed relief as the court found him not guilty of an offence under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
JK High Court Acquits Employee, Emphasizes Strong Evidence Requirement:In case of rectification of any error in article , Visit on Correction Policy & Register your Query:
Latest Posts
- After 17 Years in Exile, Tarique Rahman Set to Become Bangladesh PM
February 13, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - J&K High Court Adjourns Hearing in AAP MLA Mehraj Malik’s PSA Detention Case to February 19
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Jammu Kashmir, Politics - Madras High Court Directs MS Dhoni to Deposit ₹10 Lakh in Defamation Case Against Ex-IPS Officer
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Sports - T20 World Cup 2026: Pakistan Spinner Usman Tariq Responds to Action Criticism, Says India Will Face ‘Extra Pressure’
February 12, 2026 | Sports - Athar Amin Zargar Appointed Additional Secretary in Jammu Kashmir Home Department
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Doda, Jammu Kashmir - NATO upgrades Brussels HQ broadcast studio with Grass Valley LDX 135 cameras
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, World - Rx Propellant appoints Ashish Singh as CEO & Managing Director
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, India - Bangladesh Election 2026: Voting Begins Amid Security Alert, Minority Concerns
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Instagram Denies Addiction Claims In Landmark US Trial
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Mauganj – Madhya Pradesh: BJP MLA Pradeep Patel Missing From Public View For Nearly A Month
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics
