
SC Rejects J-k Govt’s plea against HC Order to create 334 Judicial Posts
AGENCIES
The Supreme Court has dismissed the Jammu and Kashmir government’s challenge to a High Court order directing the Union Territory authorities to create 334 judicial posts within 60 days, Live Law reported. A bench comprising Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti refused to entertain the special leave petition, clarifying that the observations in the High Court’s interim order were tentative and subject to the final decision in the ongoing proceedings.
In delivering the decision, the Supreme Court bench noted, “We see no reason to entertain the present SLP, and the same is accordingly dismissed. However, the observations made in the interim order at the interlocutory stage are tentative and subject to the final order that would be passed in the pending proceedings.”
The case has its roots in a 2017 writ petition originally seeking monetary benefits for High Court employees. Over time, it expanded to address the pressing need for additional judicial staff to manage the increasing workload. The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court highlighted the urgency of creating new posts, pointing to a recommendation made by its Registry in 2014 to establish 334 posts across various categories. Despite repeated urgings, the UT administration failed to act on the proposal, sanctioning only 24 posts in 2023.
Read: No communicable disease Behind Rajouri Deaths Mystry;JK Govt Confirms
In November 2024, the High Court issued a strong order emphasising that recommendations from the judiciary regarding staffing were binding on the government and that financial implications must be borne by the UT’s consolidated fund. The order criticised the administration’s slow response and attempts to compare Jammu and Kashmir’s requirements with other states, citing unique challenges faced by the High Court, including its dual locations in Srinagar and Jammu.
Read Urdu Version
The UT government approached the Supreme Court, arguing that staffing decisions should be handled administratively rather than judicially. Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj contended that 156 posts had already been created and expressed concern that judicial observations could constrain the government’s ability to function effectively.
Also Read: Bandipora Police recovers stolen goods worth Rs 8.5 Lakh
Justice Bhatti, while addressing these arguments, remarked that the High Court’s dissatisfaction stemmed from comparisons made with other High Courts. The bench clarified that the High Court’s observations should be tentative. However, the Supreme Court refused to overturn the High Court’s directive to create the posts.
The High Court is scheduled to review the matter on January 25.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by VoM News staff and is published from the syndicated feed)
Latest Posts
- Bigg Boss Leads India’s TV Streaming Rankings; 365 Days Tops Movie Rankings For November 2-811 Nov 2026
- Iran Urges US to Accept Demands for Reopening Strait of Hormuz, What Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi Said?11 Nov 2026
- US House Blocks Impeachment Push Against Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth11 Nov 2026
- Former PM Sheikh Hasina Will Face Execution if She Returns to Bangladesh, Prosecutor Md Aminul Islam Says11 Nov 2026
- At Least 12 Killed, 46 Injured in Multiple Crashes Amid Dense Fog in Bulgaria11 Nov 2026
- No Need to Resume Major Combat Operations Against Iran, says Secretary of State Marco Rubio11 Nov 2026
- ROWAN Announces Black Friday Deals on Nova Reverie Espresso Machines, Offers Up to 25% Discount10 Nov 2026
- Protestors Arrested During #BlockTheIPO Action at NYC Anthropic Offices10 Nov 2026
- Sunshine Society Introduces “Lil Pickle,” a Print Created in Loving Memory of Lilian Smart10 Nov 2026
- Erosion of an Exemplary System: The Cost of Police Home-Entry Powers in Belgium10 Nov 2026
