
SC Rejects J-k Govt’s plea against HC Order to create 334 Judicial Posts
AGENCIES
The Supreme Court has dismissed the Jammu and Kashmir government’s challenge to a High Court order directing the Union Territory authorities to create 334 judicial posts within 60 days, Live Law reported. A bench comprising Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti refused to entertain the special leave petition, clarifying that the observations in the High Court’s interim order were tentative and subject to the final decision in the ongoing proceedings.
In delivering the decision, the Supreme Court bench noted, “We see no reason to entertain the present SLP, and the same is accordingly dismissed. However, the observations made in the interim order at the interlocutory stage are tentative and subject to the final order that would be passed in the pending proceedings.”
The case has its roots in a 2017 writ petition originally seeking monetary benefits for High Court employees. Over time, it expanded to address the pressing need for additional judicial staff to manage the increasing workload. The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court highlighted the urgency of creating new posts, pointing to a recommendation made by its Registry in 2014 to establish 334 posts across various categories. Despite repeated urgings, the UT administration failed to act on the proposal, sanctioning only 24 posts in 2023.
Read: No communicable disease Behind Rajouri Deaths Mystry;JK Govt Confirms
In November 2024, the High Court issued a strong order emphasising that recommendations from the judiciary regarding staffing were binding on the government and that financial implications must be borne by the UT’s consolidated fund. The order criticised the administration’s slow response and attempts to compare Jammu and Kashmir’s requirements with other states, citing unique challenges faced by the High Court, including its dual locations in Srinagar and Jammu.
Read Urdu Version
The UT government approached the Supreme Court, arguing that staffing decisions should be handled administratively rather than judicially. Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj contended that 156 posts had already been created and expressed concern that judicial observations could constrain the government’s ability to function effectively.
Also Read: Bandipora Police recovers stolen goods worth Rs 8.5 Lakh
Justice Bhatti, while addressing these arguments, remarked that the High Court’s dissatisfaction stemmed from comparisons made with other High Courts. The bench clarified that the High Court’s observations should be tentative. However, the Supreme Court refused to overturn the High Court’s directive to create the posts.
The High Court is scheduled to review the matter on January 25.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by VoM News staff and is published from the syndicated feed)
Latest Posts
- Houthi Drone Attack Disrupts Operations at Saudi Arabia’s Najran Airport
August 5, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Lebanon, Israel Hold Fresh US-Mediated Talks in Rome on Southern Withdrawal
August 5, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Oracle Corp goes for high-stakes ratings gamble in AI strategy
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, World - Vishwesh Negi Appointed India’s Next Ambassador to Iran
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - Leader of Opposition Udhayanidhi Stalin Arrested by Chennai Police Over Controversial Remarks on Actor Trisha
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - Pakistan Blocks Al Jazeera Reportedly After Coverage of PoK Protests, Electoral Process
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, World - US Acknowledges Strikes Failed to Pressure Iran, Military Seeks New Strategies
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Hormuz Shipping Remains Slow as Oil Prices Fall on Renewed Hopes of US-Iran Talks
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Nifty 50 Likely to Open in Red After Sharp Previous Session Rally
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, Stock Market - Brown University President Christina Paxson to Step Down After Clash With Trump Administration
August 4, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World