
Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Adani-Hindenburg SIT Probe
Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Adani-Hindenburg SIT Probe
Key Highlights:
- Supreme Court dismisses review petition for SIT probe into Adani-Hindenburg issue.
- Court finds no errors in the original judgment; upholds SEBI’s regulatory role.
- Petition claimed regulatory failures and sought a court-monitored investigation.
The Supreme Court has dismissed a review petition challenging its decision not to establish a court-monitored Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the Adani-Hindenburg issue, which involves allegations of stock price manipulation by the Adani Group. The review petition, filed by Anamika Jaiswal, sought to overturn the January 3, 2024, judgment that declined to transfer the investigation from the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to an SIT.
Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, reviewed the petition and found no apparent error in the original judgment. The bench stated, “Having perused the review petition, there is no error apparent on the face of the record. No case for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed.”
The petitioner argued that SEBI had regulatory failures that contributed to alleged market manipulations by the Adani Group. The review plea highlighted amendments made to the FPI Regulations in 2018 and 2019, which, according to the petitioner, diluted regulations concerning beneficial ownership and transparency in offshore investments.
The Supreme Court reaffirmed its stance that the scope of its judicial review is limited to determining violations of fundamental rights and that there was no material to doubt SEBI’s investigation. The court emphasized that SEBI cannot operate solely based on press reports, though such reports can serve as inputs for the regulator.
The original judgment stated that there was no need to transfer the probe to an SIT or another agency, supporting SEBI’s regulatory competence in handling the matter. This verdict came amid multiple petitions seeking a court-monitored investigation or a CBI probe into the allegations made by Hindenburg Research against the Adani Group.
Latest Posts
- Major Blow to AAP in Rajya Sabha, 7 Rajya Sabha MPs including Raghav Chadha Join BJP
April 24, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - 5 Killed, 4 Injured in Truck-Car Collision in Bhandara
April 24, 2026 | Breaking News, India - IAF, PIB Dismiss Claims of Aircraft Crash in J&K’s Kishtwar as False
April 24, 2026 | Breaking News, Jammu Kashmir, Kishtwar - US Announces $10 Million Reward for Iraqi Militia Leader Hashim Finyan Rahim al-Saraji, Linked to Iran
April 24, 2026 | Breaking News, World - President Young Star Cricket Club Doda Meets Minister Javed Rana, Seeks Support for Gufran Memorial T20 Championship
April 24, 2026 | Doda, Jammu Kashmir, Sports - Lava Bold N1 5G Arrives in New 6GB RAM, 128GB Storage Variant in India: Price, Features
April 23, 2026 | Mobiles, Tech - iPhone 18 Could Fall Behind iPhone 17 With Older Display Material, Widening Gap With Pro Models: Report
April 23, 2026 | Mobiles, Tech - iOS 26.4.2 Update Rolled Out With Fix for Bug Used to Extract Notifications for Deleted Chats
April 23, 2026 | Mobiles, Tech - Moto G87 Could Feature at Least 8GB RAM, 256GB Storage
April 23, 2026 | Mobiles, Tech - Poco C81 Launched in India With 6,300mAh Battery, 13-Megapixel Camera Alongside Poco C81x: Price, Specifications
April 23, 2026 | Mobiles, Tech, Technology