
ED Can’t Arrest After Special Court Takes Cognizance: SC
ED Can’t Arrest After Special Court Takes Cognizance: SC
New Delhi [India], May 16 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Thursday held that the Enforcement Directorate cannot arrest an accused person after the special court has taken cognizance of the complaint.
A bench of justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan also made it clear that if ED requires custody, then the probe agency can move the application before the concerned court and thereafter, the court can only grant custody once satisfied with the reasons that custodial interrogation is required.The court, while delivering its decision, remarked that if the ED wants custody of the accused who appears after service of summons for conducting further investigation of the same offence, the probe agency will have to seek custody of the accused by moving the application to the Special Court.
The Supreme Court also made it clear that the top court may permit custody only if it is satisfied that custodial interrogation is required, even though the accused was never arrested under Section 19 of the PMLA. The court’s decision came while dealing with questions of whether an accused under the provisions of the Prevention Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case has to meet the stringent twin test for bail even in cases where the special court takes cognizance of the chargesheet.
The petitioner Tarsem Lal in the top court has challenged Punjab and Haryana High Court’s December 2023 order, which denied anticipatory bail to him in a money laundering case.In today’s order the top court also held that the accused who appeared before the court pursuant to the summon wouldn’t be required to apply for bail.
Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra, appearing for the petitioner, said that at the post complaint without arrest stage, any person already cited as an accused cannot be arrested under Section 19 PMLA.
When an accused appears before the Special Court under the issuance of process vide summons/warrant, any consideration of his application for furnishing bail or bond, whether interim or final, would not be governed by the rigours imposed under Section 45(1)(ii) PMLA as the said person had not been arrested under Section 19 during the course of investigation, he further said. (ANI)
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by VoM News staff and is published from syndicated feed)
Latest Posts
- WhatsApp Enhances Chat Backup Controls
June 21, 2026 | Technology - Rockstar Games Shares New Look at Vice City on GTA 6 Website, Removes Release Date Mentions
June 21, 2026 | Gaming - Iran Has No Intention of Building Nuclear Weapons; Will Not Abandon Uranium Enrichment : Iran President Masoud Pezeshkian
June 21, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Bitcoin Price Slides to $62,700 ; Crypto Market Under Pressure
June 21, 2026 | Crypto currency - Malta Seeks Public Feedback on Proposed Regulatory Framework for DeFi and DAOs
June 21, 2026 | Crypto currency - India-EU Free Trade Agreement to Be Signed by December, Says Piyush Goyal
June 21, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics, World - US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, Piyush Goyal to Hold Key Talks on India-US Trade Deal
June 21, 2026 | Breaking News, India, World - Pakistan PM Shebaz Sharif & Field Marshel Asim Munir Arrives in Switzerland For Talks on proposed Us-Iran Agreement
June 21, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Haier HQLED P7 Pro Series Smart TVs Launched in India With Dolby Atmos, 50W Speakers
June 21, 2026 | Tech, Technology - Redmi Turbo 5 With 50-Megapixel Rear Camera, Dimensity 8500 Ultra Chip Goes on Sale in India: Price, Offers
June 21, 2026 | Tech, Technology