Bombay HC Criticizes Government’s Role in Legal Proceedings

Bombay HC Criticizes Government’s Role in Legal Proceedings
Bombay HC Criticizes Government’s Role in Legal Proceedings
In a noteworthy commentary on the Central government’s engagement in legal matters, the Bombay High Court expressed concerns about its role as the largest litigant and its frequent requests for adjournments, despite emphasizing the importance of the “ease of doing business.”
Government’s Frequent Requests for Adjournments
The division bench of Justices Gautam Patel and Kamal Khata voiced its observations while addressing a petition filed by Ramkali Gupta in 2016, relating to property issues. The bench was taken aback by the fact that Gupta’s petition had languished for seven years. Moreover, since June of the current year, the plea had been adjourned multiple times at the behest of the Union government, awaiting the appearance of the additional solicitor general.
The court noted the Union government’s repetitive claims about case backlogs, frequent adjournments, and their impact on the ease of doing business. However, it pointed out that these assertions often ignored the fact that the government itself was the primary litigant, and it was frequently responsible for unnecessary adjournments, as demonstrated by the current case.
Strong Displeasure Towards Repeated Adjournments
Expressing strong disapproval of repeated adjournment requests, the court stressed that the issue raised in the petition was narrow and suitable for a final hearing at the admission stage itself.
The court also remarked that it did not expect the additional solicitor general to be personally present in every Union of India-related matter. Instead, it emphasized the need for competent advocates from his office to share the workload and assist in fulfilling the duties of his office.
In the end, the bench adjourned the plea for the last time, citing courtesy to the additional solicitor general.
This commentary by the Bombay High Court sheds light on the challenges faced by the judiciary in managing the legal proceedings involving the government and underscores the need for efficient handling of cases, especially those with narrow issues, to ensure timely justice and the ease of doing business.
Latest Posts
- Following The Assassination Of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Mojtaba Khamenei Elected As New Supreme Leader of Iran
March 4, 2026 | Featured by VoM, Politics, World - US Has Bombed at Least 10 Countries Since 9/11 — And the Count Keeps Growing in 2026
March 4, 2026 | Featured by VoM, Politics, World - Iran’s Regional Attacks – A Broader Strategy Designed To Expand Pressure On The Global Stage, Beyond the Battlefield
March 4, 2026 | Articles/Editorials, Breaking News, Featured by VoM - LIVE Updates: Russia and China Condemn US‑Israeli Attacks on Iran, Call for Ceasefire
March 4, 2026 | Live Updates, Politics, World - No Trade With Spain says, US President Donald Trump, After Spain Restricted Military Bases
March 4, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - UN Nuclear Chief Rafael Grossi Says No Evidence of Coordinated Iranian Weapons Program
March 3, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - At Least 40 Killed, 246 Wounded in Lebanon Amid Escalating Israel-US Attacks on Iran
March 3, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian Says Government Still Functioning, Trump Rules Out Talks and Oman Reports Drone Strikes
March 3, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Kashmir Valley Under Communication Curbs Following Death of Iran’s Supreme Leader
March 3, 2026 | Breaking News, Jammu Kashmir - 780 Killed In Iran Since US-Israel Strikes Began Says Iranian Red Crescent
March 3, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World