
Punjab and Haryana High Court Urges Amicable Settlement in ‘Delhi Chalo’ March Case
Punjab and Haryana High Court Urges Amicable Settlement in ‘Delhi Chalo’ March Case
Court Calls for Balancing Fundamental Rights and Maintaining Law and Order
In a hearing on petitions related to the ‘Delhi Chalo’ march by farmers, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has called for an amicable settlement. The court emphasized the need for a balance between the farmers’ right to protest and the public’s right to free movement. It urged all parties to identify specific areas for peaceful protests, emphasizing that the use of force should be the last resort. The court sought a status report from the Centre, Punjab, Haryana, and Delhi governments on the ongoing protest. The matter is adjourned till Thursday.
Differing Petitions Addressed by the Court
Two PILs Presented
The court addressed two PILs regarding the farmers’ protest—one highlighting the violation of the right to free movement and the other emphasizing the inconvenience caused by the march. The first petition argued that preventing farmers from reaching Delhi violates their democratic rights, while the second expressed concerns about the public’s inconvenience and urged that no one should block national highways.
Government Responses
Centre Ready for Negotiations
The Centre stated its readiness for negotiations, including discussing the farmers’ demand for a law on minimum support price (MSP). The Haryana government explained its actions, citing the need to maintain law and order, especially considering past incidents during farmers’ protests. The Punjab government acknowledged the merit in farmers’ demands and assured arrangements for peaceful protests.
Court’s Stand and Future Actions
Balancing Rights and Ensuring Law and Order
The court emphasized the importance of balancing the farmers’ right to protest with the state’s duty to maintain law and order. It urged Punjab and Haryana to designate specific protest areas, emphasizing the rights of both protesters and the general public. The court adjourned the matter to Thursday, calling for an amicable resolution before then.
Investigations are ongoing regarding the farmers’ protest, with reports of the use of drones and the deployment of tear gas. The court’s stance aims to address the concerns raised while promoting a peaceful resolution.
Latest Posts
- After 17 Years in Exile, Tarique Rahman Set to Become Bangladesh PM
February 13, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - J&K High Court Adjourns Hearing in AAP MLA Mehraj Malik’s PSA Detention Case to February 19
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Jammu Kashmir, Politics - Madras High Court Directs MS Dhoni to Deposit ₹10 Lakh in Defamation Case Against Ex-IPS Officer
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Sports - T20 World Cup 2026: Pakistan Spinner Usman Tariq Responds to Action Criticism, Says India Will Face ‘Extra Pressure’
February 12, 2026 | Sports - Athar Amin Zargar Appointed Additional Secretary in Jammu Kashmir Home Department
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Doda, Jammu Kashmir - NATO upgrades Brussels HQ broadcast studio with Grass Valley LDX 135 cameras
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, World - Rx Propellant appoints Ashish Singh as CEO & Managing Director
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, India - Bangladesh Election 2026: Voting Begins Amid Security Alert, Minority Concerns
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, Politics, World - Instagram Denies Addiction Claims In Landmark US Trial
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Mauganj – Madhya Pradesh: BJP MLA Pradeep Patel Missing From Public View For Nearly A Month
February 12, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics
