
Centre Cites Precedent in Extension of Delhi Chief Secretary’s Tenure
Centre Cites Precedent in Extension of Delhi Chief Secretary’s Tenure
The Supreme Court of India, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, was informed by the Centre that in the past decade, 57 extensions have been granted to chief secretaries of various states at the time of their superannuation. This disclosure came during a hearing where the Court allowed the extension of Delhi Chief Secretary Naresh Kumar’s tenure by six months, just a day before his scheduled retirement.
Legal Battle Over Chief Secretary’s Extension
The Union Ministry of Home Affairs’ decision to extend Kumar’s tenure was a significant setback for the AAP government in Delhi. The Supreme Court upheld the extension, finding it consistent with the law and the Constitution. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain, representing the Centre, contended that the union government possesses the authority to appoint and extend the tenure of the chief secretary, as per the amended law and other provisions.
Contentions and Counterarguments
Senior lawyer Abhishek Singhvi, representing the AAP government, argued that the chief secretary’s role spans beyond police, public order, and land, which are under the Delhi government’s domain. He questioned the rationale behind extending the tenure of an official with whom the state government has no confidence. Chief Justice Chandrachud highlighted the need for reasonableness in the appointment process, noting past instances where the central and state governments cooperated effectively.
Clarification on Appointment Powers
The solicitor general emphasized that the provision in the law clearly states the power of appointing the Chief Secretary lies with the Central Government. He referred to the AGMUT cadre, where the term ‘state government’ is synonymous with the Centre. Section 45A(d) of the GNCTD Act was cited to affirm the central government’s role in appointing the Chief Secretary of the National Capital Territory of Delhi.
This ruling has implications for the governance structure of Delhi, reflecting the ongoing tug-of-war between the central and state governments over administrative control.
Centre Cites Precedent in Extension of Delhi Chief Secretary’s Tenure: In case of rectification of any error in this Article, Visit on Correction Policy or Register your Query
Latest Posts
- 61 Dead in Afghanistan as Snow, Heavy Rain Lash Country Over Three Days
January 24, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Delhi Court Allows MP Er Rashid to Attend Budget Session Under Custody Parole
January 24, 2026 | Breaking News, India, Politics - How Njord Partners Sits at The Crossroads of Power and Dirty Money
January 23, 2026 | Breaking News, World - Madhya Pradesh: 9 Hospitalised After Drinking Contaminated Water in Mhow
January 23, 2026 | Breaking News, India - IndiGo Delhi-Pune Flight Gets Bomb Threat
January 23, 2026 | Breaking News, India - Ginnie Mae Publishes Fiscal Year 2025 Annual Financial Report
January 23, 2026 | Breaking News, Business, World - US Deploys Military Assets to Middle East Amid Softer Iran Tone From Trump
January 23, 2026 | Breaking News - Microsoft 365 Down For Thousands Of Users: Report
January 23, 2026 | Tech, Technology - Baby On Board! Bronx Zoo Announces Birth of Endangered Primate: Pygmy Slow Loris
January 22, 2026 | Climate & Environment, World - Janu-worry scams spike: Gen Z and Millennial Brits most likely to fall for investment fraud, survey reveals
January 22, 2026 | Cybersecurity, World
