
SC Directs No Coercive Action Against Halal Trust in Halal-Certified Products Sale Case
SC Directs No Coercive Action Against Halal Trust in Halal-Certified Products Sale Case
In a significant development, the Supreme Court granted protection to Mahmood Madani, the chief of Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind Halal Trust, and other office-bearers from coercive action in connection with a 2023 criminal case in Uttar Pradesh. This case relates to the ban on halal-certified products. Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta ordered Uttar Pradesh police not to take coercive action against Madani and others while issuing notice on their plea challenging the state government’s ban on manufacturing, selling, storing, and distributing halal-certified products.
Legal Challenge to Ban on Halal Products in Uttar Pradesh
The apex court had previously issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh government based on pleas by Halal India Private Limited and Jamiat Ulam e-Hind Halal Trust Maharashtra, seeking the quashing of the ban on halal-certified products in the state. The current protection order follows the government’s ban on November 18, which targeted the entire process of halal certification, and FIRs subsequently registered against the petitioners. The plea asserts that despite the organization’s cooperation in the investigation, the government summoned the trust’s president without specifying the necessary requirements.
Allegations and Legal Response
The FIR registered in Lucknow accused organizations of extorting money in the name of halal certification, promoting enmity in the name of religion, and funding anti-national activities. The petitioners argued that they were wrongly implicated without any involvement in halal certification issuance. They contended that the government’s notification, focusing only on halal certification and excluding others like Jain and Satvik, was arbitrary, discriminatory, and against the secular fabric of the nation. The legal challenge emphasizes the lack of rational basis in the ban’s impact on public health and calls for quashing the notification.
This legal development underscores the broader issue of religious-based certification and its treatment by government authorities, raising questions about arbitrary classifications and their alignment with the principles of a secular democracy.
Latest Posts
- US believes Iran hasn’t decided to build a nuclear weapon
October 11, 2024 | Breaking News, United States of America, World - Donald Trump Receives First FIFA Peace Prize: What It Is
December 7, 2025 | Breaking News, Politics, World - J-K LG Manoj Sinha vs Omar Abdullah Over Age Relaxation For Job Aspirants
December 6, 2025 | Breaking News, Jammu Kashmir, Politics - Realme Narzo Phones Confirmed to Launch in India Soon via Amazon
December 6, 2025 | Breaking News, Tech - Nothing Phone 3a Lite Goes on Sale in India: See Price, Offers, Availability
December 6, 2025 | Tech - NVIDIA Needed Just $2200 to Make Investors Millionaires
December 6, 2025 | Business, World - Entertainment Shake-Up: Netflix Nears $83 Billion Acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery
December 5, 2025 | Breaking News, Tech - Bilateral Trade Between India and Russia to Reach $100 Billion, Putin Says
December 5, 2025 | Breaking News, World - Putin Ordered 2018 Novichok Poisoning Of Ex-Russian Spy: UK Inquiry
December 5, 2025 | Breaking News, World - MoneyHero and Coinbase Jointly Publish Pulse of Crypto — Singapore 2025 Survey Report
November 20, 2025 | Breaking News, World - Kwikset Honored in SecurityInfoWatch.com Readers’ Choice Awards
November 18, 2025 | World
